A Secret Weapon For duty to avoid conflict of interest case law
A Secret Weapon For duty to avoid conflict of interest case law
Blog Article
These provisions implement to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, although the transaction occurred before its promulgation. Read more
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all guarantee legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of the boy or girl usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are certainly not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not utilize, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he is acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually nicely-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment via the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan within the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid on the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. Read more
However it is made apparent that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also be certain regard on the family lose in accordance with legislation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become reached. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated previously mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that while thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part in the respondent department.
Article 27 website of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity in the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the clear negation in the law laid down with the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. If your appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are guided with the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be a person or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for your decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.